Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mari, the Happy Wanderer's avatar

There were so many little touches to love about this chapter (I laughed out loud at Harry and Fleury’s ogling Lucy’s neck and arms so much that they were incapable of killing a mosquito, for example). But for me the very finest moment came at the end of chapter 9, when Lucy, thanks to a letter from Louise, makes it to safety in the nick of time.

Until this week’s reading, we had only seen Louise from Fleury’s and Harry’s perspectives, and so she came off as an empty-headed beauty and exemplar of pure womanhood. In Fleury’s eyes, she isn’t even human but resembles Chloë the lapdog—ornamental, meant for others’ amusement, and ominously subject to being disposed of once she ceases to amuse.

How wonderful to discover that Louise in fact is 1. Kind and practical. She takes care of all those children who (hilariously) are driven to tears by the Padre’s wretched sermons. 2. Not at all uptight. Her brother may wish to shield her from “contamination,” but Louise obviously thinks this is stupid and that in fact Lucy was more sinned against than sinning. Louise’s letter, promising friendship to Lucy, is a model of true Christian behavior—if only the high-minded and judgmental men would learn from her example!

Expand full comment
harpreet's avatar

(I just want to say that I love Vokins. In this chapter, JG Farrell shows the similar status of the Indians and the British working class in the colonisers' impoverished imagination)

-- There is much to be said about this, and dare I say, I wonder if something of this attitude persists today.

Simon your commentary is so rich as always. Your comments on how indigo cultivation was transmitted across the empire, how the empire was a structure for something that may be called 'globalisation' reminded me of how when I visited Kenya, where my great grandfather arrived to build the railways in the 1930s from India. They needed carpenters, and that skill threw them to another continent, all within the structure of the empire. Thus a diaspora was created in east Africa (which subsequently produced a British Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak). History is a great churning and scattering and transmission. And it is full of many ironies, both dark and light.

Reading this too, I was reminded of VS Naipaul, whose ancestors were transmitted along the empire structure to the Caribbean, to work in the sugar plantations. I wonder what Naipaul thought of Farrells's novels, if he thought of them at all. Naipaul is very much interested in the aftermath of imperialism, the dislocations and disruptions and the psychological exploration, Farrell has a really vast vision which is rooted in close detail and dark humour centred around the circumstances of the colonial class. Farrell observes the decline from the perspective of the imperial caste, in Singapore Sling & Krishnapur & Troubles, Naipaul observes the psychological terrain of the aftermath of empire in his Trinidad novels, The Mimic Men, A Bend in the River and others.

I also laughed out loud at points. Farrell's wit is a delight. The themes so deep and serious, the events so dark, but it has these moments of comedy. This is what distinguishes Farrell, makes his brew unique.

Expand full comment
41 more comments...

No posts