Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mari, the Happy Wanderer's avatar

I thought of the plagues of Egypt too! The allusion must be deliberate, because Farrell makes a point of mentioning lice, boils, and locusts (well, cockchafers) in the same section where the first of two babies born on the same day dies. The plagues make sense thematically, because they were God’s message to Pharaoh to stop committing the evil act of enslaving people—just as the more enlightened English colonizers (Louise and the Collector) are discovering that perhaps the people of India do not appreciate their “civilizing” mission.

Another tangent: Fleury’s and Harry’s consternation at Lucy’s pubic hair might be an allusion to the rumor that Ruskin’s marriage had to be annulled, unconsummated, because he was so disturbed by the sight of his wife’s pubic hair on their wedding night. After a lifetime of looking pure white marble statues of women, Ruskin may not have been equipped to handle a flesh-and-blood woman.

I hope it’s ok to share a link to a piece I wrote that discusses the Ruskin story and also shares a portrait of him, painted by the man who wound up marrying Ruskin’s rejected wife:

https://open.substack.com/pub/marischindele/p/art-i-liked-at-the-ashmolean?r=7fpv6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

Expand full comment
harpreet's avatar

Another wonderful reading, Simon, thank you.

I find Kipling to be so fascinating.

His novel Kim is so very complex and compelling. Leave aside what Kipling was for a moment, a staunch imperialist and believer in the idea of empire. I wonder if the novel reveals layers inside him he was not aware of. And the fact that Kim is the son of poor Irish, not English parents is interesting. Kim is a classic insider / outsider, observing India and the great game as both Indian and non Indian. Its a novel that may be the mother of stories of divided identity and the nuances and complexities of that, which can be seen as a theme through novels of modern diasporas too.

The Sherwood mythology is so interesting too. I think England has two great mythologies - Arthur, and Sherwood.

I've had a thought about Robin Hood (sorry for slight tangent) - he's considered a rebel but I think he may be an echo of conservatism and the Restoration. And it feeds into the earlier Arthurian mythology too. The King is absent in the land on the crusade, and a tyrant arises (the Sheriff of Nottingham) in his absence. Robin Hood is the loyal yeoman Englishman who rebels against that tyrant until order can be restored under the righteous rule of King Richard. He rebels against unjust law, but is a loyalist to the law of the just and righteous King who is absent.

The pubic hair reference reminds me of something I read, that John Ruskin was so shocked and horrified on his wedding night to see that his wife had pubic hair, that he refused to consummate his marriage, believing her to be deformed. They idealised women so much in Victorian times, the actual reality could cause a breakdown in some men.

The richness of allusions that you identify really are fascinating. What a multifarious novel, what a brilliant and unique novel

Expand full comment
31 more comments...

No posts